1. Summarize in your own words of materials
you read
“What
is globalization?” The answer of this question is general. Also, it is
difficult to define the specific meaning of the word. The reason why getting an
answer to the question is difficult is it include various distinctive features
to maintain the word, globalization. The definition of globalization that is accepted to
everyone is yet to seek.
However, there are many attempts to define the meaning of globalization that
contains concept. Accordingly, a number of scholars are trying to find the idea
about globalization.
Velho is someone who described the
globalization as a single process and mentioned that global education is the
primary goal to grow. Therefore, globalization could be
construed as the movement of the whole world. In sociology, anthropology,
and the study of religion, globalization got specific name in late 1970s and
early 1980s.
There was the antiglobalization
movement in the late 1990s. As many people use the Internet for global
movement, global consciousness is keep developing. It is obvious that globalization
has two side of effect, good side and the bad side. In the reading, it express
as the ‘nasty’ side for bad side of globalization. More in details, the nasty
side of globalization is about the globalization of capitalism. For more
general sight of globalization, the world became a ‘single place’ continuously.
The whole world became the only one.
The most important factor of the
process of globalization is the increasing connectivity. As the world becoming
the single place, there are interconnectedness. The process of globalization
works in complicated ways with increasing connectivity. Moreover, it naturally
causes the civilizational conflict like the ‘Judeo-Christian’. Also, the
religious problems are caused in the civilizational conflict.
A lot of books and articles stipulate
about three dimensions that are major factors to define the globalization. The
economic dimension, the political dimension, the cultural dimension, and the
social dimension are the four major dimensions of globalization. For the
cultural dimension, the McDonaldization is come up the cultural imperialism and
cultural globalization. The American aspect of their social and economic has
been spread with international corporations. And we can find out that people
throughout the world have extremely similar social and economical practices.
Moreover, this phenomenon changed the tradition that each country got their
uniqueness into similar practice.
Wallerstein called the modern
world-system as the world capitalist system and he mentioned that every country
is becoming one as the progress of integration. The world has ideological
integration, such as Soviet Communist Party.
Globalization has the general
pattern: International-systemic aspect, concept of humanity, individual selves
and the nation-state.
2. Mention of any new, interesting, or
unusual items learned
Before
mention about the interesting things that I learned, it was quite difficult to
understand this reading. Each sentence in the reading is too long and too much
using of which, what, and that. So, I have to read this with carefulness. However,
it is still ambiguous about some items that I read. Firstly, the interesting
thing in this reading is about the context about the form of the globalization.
With the examples of ideological integrated nation, such as the soviet
Communist Party and the German Fascism. Secondly, for the new item I learned
from this reading are various examples about the ‘nasty’ side of globalization.
I knew just a few concepts about bad sides of globalization. I have learned the
possible bad side of globalization more. For the unusual item is the
glocalization. I could understand only a large meaning of it and I still
confuse about the glocalization in details.
3. Identify at least one question, concern,
or discussion angle
I
would like to talk about the glocalization. The word ‘glocalization’ is the
compound word of globalization and localization. It means that global products
or goods are became locally changed.(if it is wrong meaning, please teach me a
right meaning of glocalization.) And in the reading, it says ‘the alleged
problem of the relationship between the local and the global could be overcome
by a deceptively simple conceptual move.’ I need more specific details about
this statement.
No comments:
Post a Comment