I was little confused when i saw the score what they have got. Because i just thought that China and North korea which are socialist states could be the most non-conflict countries to their government in the world. And that means they can have the most peaceful political stability. People in those countries never get a chance to study or get learned about the 'Liberalism'. It's impossible to think another idea of rule their countries and impossible to criticize their government. This is how i thought. But China and North korea are classified as 'Less peaceful countries in Political instabilities'.
Site says that 'Political instabilities' assessment was conducted to figure out two things. It was "sufficiently stable to support the needs of its citizens, businesses and overseas investors". At the view of slight mixed with economic system in their countries, that score what they got is right. I interpreted at the view of the 'political system' to their people.
But I still got little confused with the term of 'Political instabilities'. I think Interpretations can have various results. It depends on which way do you want to read the meanings?
No comments:
Post a Comment